?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

A few items from this morning's Post

First: Eartha Kitt is 78 years old? WTF?!?! I mean look at her!

Secondly: Since we can safely eliminate the possibility that a Justice of the SCOTUS is a clinical moron, we must assume that when Kennedy says that if an atheist happens to walk by a display of the Ten Commandments in a public place he should just "avert his eyes," he is deliberately missing the point. I could harp on the blatant disregard of the rights of the non-religious, but even that isn't the applicable point here.

The point is that artifacts of religious doctrine do not belong on official display in public places. Anyone who truly cares about their church's autonomy ought to be fighting tooth and nail to keep it separate from government if they have any idea what's good for it. Even if the current crowd in power seems to support your views, how can you be sure they will always do so? How do you know some whim of the ruling powers won't smell like heresy to you if the winds start to blow the wrong way?

Aw, hell. You see, this is why I haven't been posting about politics much since the election. I feel so helpless and frustrated, I just start rambling. Preaching to the choir. I think I should make a resolution that I only get to prattle on about this stuff after I have taken some kind of concrete action to change the thing I feel like griping about.

So. In happier news, my wonderful Dad is coming to visit us tomorrow. Yay! He's here on business, which means my Step-Mom won't be here (bummer). But I get to see the paternal person, and that rocks. Then on Saturday, Morrigan! Hurray!

What do you say we officially start the weekend about a day and a half early?

Comments

chadu
Mar. 3rd, 2005 04:25 pm (UTC)
The point is that artifacts of religious doctrine do not belong on official display in public places. Anyone who truly cares about their church's autonomy ought to be fighting tooth and nail to keep it separate from government if they have any idea what's good for it. Even if the current crowd in power seems to support your views, how can you be sure they will always do so? How do you know some whim of the ruling powers won't smell like heresy to you if the winds start to blow the wrong way?

Bingo. None of these folks Gets It.

I think that either you post 'em all (all religions or lack-thereof represented) or you don't post 'em.

Now, while there's an argument to be made for the 10 Commandments being a piece of legal history, I think they should only be posted in context with other historical legal milestones -- Hammurabi's Code, Magna Carta, yadda yadda.

Also, in the legal history light, interesting question: which version of the 10 C's should you post? Hebrew? Catholic? KJV? Various flavors of Protestant?

Personally, I think it would be killer-funny if the 10 C's were allowed to be posted in public/gov't places, but only in the original Hebrew, because no translation counts. I think that'd send some of the more crypto-anti-Semites around the bend.

Then again, some of the more wacky and strident sorts about these issues probably think Jesus spoke English.

CU
_blackjack_
Mar. 3rd, 2005 04:34 pm (UTC)
Then again, some of the more wacky and strident sorts about these issues probably think Jesus spoke English.

That's not too far off. There are a LARGE number of Evangelicals who believe the King James translation is devinely inspired. Which it must have been, since there are lots of places where it wasn't inspired by the actual meaning of the text.
chadu
Mar. 3rd, 2005 04:46 pm (UTC)
The KJV was inspired by an overweight transvestite from Baltimore?

. . .

That's my story, and I'm sticking to it.

(Seriously, though: from what I can tell, as poetry, the KJV is pretty good. As a translation of the Bible, it blows stoats.)

CU

Profile

ghost
fenriss
Fenriss

Latest Month

February 2019
S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728  

Page Summary

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Lilia Ahner